Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutchgit
I wonder how many pictures there are of BMW 1200 GS's circling the www with broken rear swing arms, broken final drives/gearboxes etc. Still doesn't stop people buying them. I think there is one or possibly two cases where the swing arm on an X bike broke which down to a faulty suspension set up. Give such a thing to a rider who has no idea about odd noise/movements in the bike and disaster is pre-progammed.
The front doesn't lift very easily on a Challenge because of the rear shock. I had that airshock for a while but I could live with that although I now have a proper shock on it.
Just look at some RR's of people using them to go RTW. There's hardly anything that goes wrong with these bikes and there is virtually nothing to compare them with.
|
"nothing to compare them with" ? Really?
(think about that one!)
Sure, some good stories of RTW rides on X bikes and broke swingarm is Rare, indeed!
Colebatch is most famous X bike rider I know of. But even his $$Big Money$$ custom X Challenge has had numerous engine and other components rebuilt several times. (Lots of his custom work done in Holland at Hot Rod factory) A Nice Bike, but not typical of X bikes out there and one few could ever hope to build or afford.
The Kymco (Taiwan) made motor is good, and would only have got better had BMW stuck with its development. Rotax did original design, good then but quite old now. (DR650, KLR, XR650L, XT600 all around 20 years old too!
)
I believe some X bikes have the bad water pump seal issue that other F and G single BMW's had (have) (also made by Kymco)
TOO TRUE, GS12's have more final drive failures ... and as you say ... riders still buy them! I love riding the R1200GS
... just would not own one.
(can't afford one either!)
But this illustrates my point: Had BMW stayed behind the X bike line and continued R&D with them, I contend they could have had a world class bike dual sport/travel bike. They only manufactured the bike for what, two or three years?
Even so, I'd sooner ride long distance on an old X bike than ANY KTM single, new or old. But neither are as good (or as good value) as my Suzuki DR650. Honda XR650L, Yam XT660 and Kawi KLR650 also good value travel bikes. Cheaper to buy and run than any BMW. Sorry, just the way it is. Maybe in EU they're cheaper?
But if the X bikes were still in production I'd certainly be looking closely at one now. BMW have the ability to make a bike as good as they wish. It's a shame what happened to the X bikes under an incompetent management, made decision to cancel the bike.
Mistake, IMO.
Remember, the Japanese have been hard at work making dual sport and dirt bikes since the 1960's. They've won countless championships in ALL classes, world wide for 50 years. What have BMW won?
Japanese big 4 have won dozens of Motocross, Enduro, Cross Country and Road Racing championships in the last 50 years.
What was BMW doing all this time?
BMW are relative new comers to any sort of serious, long term racing. They never made dirt bikes (save one year for G450), never raced off road save one world enduro season and a few Dakar races and never showed any interest whatsoever in true off road capable dual sport bikes ... except for the X with very halfhearted attempts with F and G bikes.
The Japanese have produced HUNDREDS of different dual sport models going back to 1960's, from 50cc to 800cc (DR Big). From kids bikes to full on factory race bikes ... and are still producing them TODAY. They've done it all. For 50 years.
Sorry, I don't consider R80, R100 or any GS as "off road capable" ... I'd sooner ride a 30 year old Honda XL500 then any BMW in serious off road conditions.
But ... BMW DO make good travel bikes.
But racing is what brings technology forward ... and that is why the Japanese lead. The corporate arrogance of BMW is unbelievable, always amazed me. (we have another word for it
)
86Likes
Threaded Mode
