Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastship
Umm well not quite...
The Road Traffic (NHS Charges) Act 1999 currently permits the Compensation Recovery Unit (CRU) to recover NHS treatment charges arising out of road traffic accidents from compensating motor insurers. The Health & Social Care (Community Health & Standards) Act 2003 provides for the scheme to be extended to cover all cases where a Claimant has made a successful personal injury claim, which will bring in EL, PL and product liability claims in addition to motor.
One reason why insurance premiums are so high and the police are cracking down? Stealth tax by any chance???
My brother was skiing in Switzerland three weeks ago and one of their party broke her leg and was lifted off the mountain without charge. Her leg was very proffesionally set with external splints and no dressing and the Swiss doctors said not to worry about MRSA; that's a British disease they told her.
The NHS is not free to me - two thirds of the price of petrol in my bike is tax as is about 50% of my entire income.
On Monday I have my first dental appointment in two years too. I'm lucky to find one and it's taken me two years to save up for the treatment I'm likely to need. Free it ain;t  Still - one great thing about British dentistry is that I can keep my visor propped open with my lower incisor
Lastly, when I asked my GP last year not to upload my medical records to the NHS spine I was told the state owned my medical not me and the only way I could prevent him uploading my records to the governemnt's national database was if I withdrew from the NHS. I did and as a consequence I have no NHS entitlement even though I still pay the same taxes and can't afford private health coverage.
|
Hi again,
Yes, I was aware of the first bit in broad terms, without being able to quote the bell, book and candle.
Yep, there is a move toward getting the insurance companies involved which could act as some sort of check on bad claims I guess: going right off topic again, you will recognise that there are many initiatives to catch out those who are less than honest in their daily lives (the latest = the ex-town mayor who has been discovered to be claiming £1000s in benefits for disability while being an active football referee).
I understand that the ins company pay a contribution toward the removal of a traffic accident victim to the hospital (which is paid by the ins, not the individual = about £100?); thereafter, the treatment is still free.
I would not describe it as a "tax" - differentiation of what is medical treatment and other aspects (but, yep, we could be paying for food in hospital next - why not, you have to when at home?).
I could not blame the executive arm (the police) for doing as they are told in any particular "crackdown": the direction comes from the politicians, increasingly from Local Govn which is receiving increasing powers from central Govn.
Switzerland: don't really know enough - I have always understood that there are liabilities for rescue on the mountains (try calling out a helicopter

), but that was some years ago.
We all pay taxes, unless you are extremely rich: all tax is not ring-fenced, but the NHS is still free.
Yep, dentists have opted out: the Govn have failed to tie them in and they are ripping off their clients as private patients (I know one or two who openly brag about their income) - they must be charging about the same as a BMW main dealer's hourly rate!
It is not a perfect system I would agree. Teeth and eyes are neglected items!
On the final point we are back to databases and what to do with them: that is a biggy!
How about the idea to make it compulsory that you are an organ donor unless you opt out (the opposite of the present system)? -- over my dead body!!!!!!!!!! Now that is one that I do object to.

Apologies to one and all!