Quote:
Originally Posted by tremens
That's really bold statement and couldn't be father from the true.
The biggest downside of 21" are tubes, next is handling. If there would be no problem on tarmac with 21" front wheel MotoGP would use them instead of 17" 
|
Wow, old thread, sorry I missed this one.
You'll need to take my statement in context of what the conversation was about. We're talking 50/50 riding, so at least some dirt in the mix. So right away the 21" front is in the lead over 19 and 17 fronts.
Lots of bikes have tubes front & rear. YES ... it's PITA ass to do flats. But often the wheels are tougher than cast wheels, can be cheaper too.
I find handling on my current and former 21" equipped bikes has been remarkably good. You should come ride with us. On a recent twisty road ride
I out ran 5 better riders riding new KTM 1290s ... this on my 37 HP DR650 with a 21" front tire ... a knobby to boot!

Granted it was all tight switchbacks most take at 20 mph. I can go double that speed on my DR. KTM guys can't hack it. But on any sort of smooth fast road ... they're GONE in an instant.
(160 HP) I owned 5 or 6 sports bikes before I ever owned a dual sport, lots of track days, schools, so i can ride a bit.
When I first started riding dual sport bikes 30 years ago I was stunned to discover just how good these 21" equipped "dirt bikes" handled. My first encounter was riding with Motorcyclist magazine staff. They were on FZ1000's,
Buell's, CBR600 and the like. On the very tight and dirty roads I kept pace easily on my old 1987 XL600R Honda.
Next, bring RAIN into the mix. Nothing works better on rainy roads than a dual sport with a 21" front. I can outrun many average riders on sports bike ... and I'm old and slow.
If you don't have good sporty roads where you live then you'll never know just how good these bikes can be. The Suzuki is simply a superb handler.