Quote:
Originally Posted by Warthog
Wart?!? I know I may be aesthetically challenged, but come on!! 
|
 HEHEHE sorry about  that it even took me 2 0r 3 times reading it to understand i just called you a Wart.. No offence intended.
Well I have gone with the sigma 70-200 2.8, I would have wanted the nikon 70-200 but could not afford the £1500. The 80-400 (the copy i played with) was not slow at all (although not silent wave so a bit noisy), I really liked it. physical size the sigma 70-200 and the 80-400 are very close so that was not a huge deal breaker. In the end i decided that the most of my shots will be under the 200mm range and thus i should maximise performace there...
Thanks again all and I hope i made the right choice..
Xander
|