![]() |
Quote:
As other has said there is no immortal bike. The idea of buying an oldish bike and prepare it yourself is good! Another important question is where do you want to go? What type of roads? Will you carry much luggage? What petrol-range do you need? How many km do you want to ride? |
Thanks
Thanks everybody i v made a deciscion it going to be a 1989' Xt600 on wich i will place 3 trunks bags tenere tank the full load to live on the road for min 3 months iv anybody got good tips for this bike what are its weak points please share it with me
have a save ride everybody :scooter: |
Hmmmmmm - dont see any road bikes in these lists ? Before you laugh Nick Saunders and this dutch guy whose name i cant remember both used R1 s and they went off road:thumbup1: there is also an australian guy who used a Fireblade !! If you aint going off road big time why use a trail bike :confused1:
Ok they may be a bit more tech but i defy anyone to say a gs IS MORE RELIABLE :thumbdown: And to hammer home the point my mates Fazer 1000 has just hit 83000 miles used every day and has never had a problem ?c? Just a thought - bound to be plenty of replies to this one i bet :funmeteryes: Im not ignoring you cos im off to Turkey on my Blackbird - and they are certainly more reliable than a Gs . |
Quote:
. . Yam Xt, Good choice. Both big enough, and small enough. Enjoy:funmeterno: |
Quote:
Unbelievable.... I would have thought that you, of all people would see that to get this topic off the ground again would be a bad idea, Patrick.... And yet I can see it starting all over again. Pigeon-holing from the off.... Firstly, the initial topic has been resolved as this poster seems to have opted for an XT600e, so, as far as I'm concerned I think this new line of discussion is off topic. Secondly, baiting others with terms like "BMW Mind Gestapo" is really not on. You will also remember that I did not care for some other remarks that you made in a now-infamous thread, as I thought them in bad taste and irrelevant. Do we really want to resurrect this again? Gypsyrider is entitled to his opinions as is anyone, and he has owned said bike but, please, please, please lets not go down this road again... For anyone who really feels the need to know the whole story, read it here, http://www.horizonsunlimited.com/hub...s-f650gs-37094 rather than having it re-hashed in a whole new thread.... |
Quote:
There is (or was) a tough section between Khavarovsk and Chita in Siberia but because the Djebel was light, it was better suited to deal with the conditions. I dont think I could have done it with a heavier bike. Apparently that section has been fully paved now so there is no problems at all. Japanese aircooled singles are the only way to go, Im convinced. But as said it comes down to what you are comfortable with riding and what makes you smile. My girlfriend and I are doing a RTW now 2-up on a postie bike. I chose this bike because its the most comfiest bike Ive ever ridden and because it makes me and everyone who see's her, smile. Super reliable because I love her so, I take good care of her...(the bike!) Feel free to PM me if you have questions. Faster-Than-Walking N |
Quote:
+1 Quote:
These are ours in Mongolia. Sold them when we got back in Oz. They didn't like the salty coastal air much. http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3004/...e1bf4e38_o.jpg |
I still don't understand how people can recomend bikes when they have no idea what the bike will be used for.
|
Quote:
The initial poster hasn't given enough information...hell, if I'd posted the same query on here before I took my trip...I guarantee you the k75 would not have made the long list...but I digress. |
Ivan, I've just done Korea to Italy (via Russia/Kazakhstan/Scandinavia) on a Burgman 650 maxiscooter, and you know what?
If I do it again I'll be doing it on the same bike. The Burgie handled the Khabarovsk to Chita section fine and had minimal problems with the offroading in Kazakhstan. I travelled 30,000km on the Burgman (and another 8,000km in China on a locally produced 125cc road bike). The total amount of offroad riding was around 3,000km or less than 8% of the total journey. Why compromise 92% of the journey by doing it on an offroad bike that is slow, uncomfortable and offers little weather protection? The Burgman handled the offroad with aplomb and yet was smooth, exceedingly comfortable, nimble (you can't beat them round bends) and economical (4-4.5l/100km) onroad. Add to the mix the CVT on the Burgman ,which made for a much more relaxing shift free ride, and you're laughing. See my blog Across the universe for details. Garry from Oz. |
Quote:
But if the road is more like this for a few thousands km a streetbike is probably not right. http://www.actiontouring.com/pic/uralr.jpg I know that petrol in Russia can lead to problems with certain bikes but I don’t know if you have to go 200 kms or 1000 kms between fuelstops. Will he travel light or not… IMHO the old XT is one of the best bikes out there, and with the right preparation it should work nice. Gestapo greetings AliBaba |
Were you riding it?
Quote:
Woohoo!! Cool picture!! That is what I hope my Ural will be doing in a couple of year's time!! All that is missing is our dog in the chair!! (Must admit that petrol range is my biggest concern for the Ural, though, and there is only so much fuel you can carry...) |
Quote:
I would go for a bike which is full mechanical .. dont worry too much for your mechanical skills . You will learn on the way (which i think how everybody learned....hard way) I would go for a bike with a supplier who ships parts worldwide ... I would go for a 2 cylinder bike ... |
Quote:
Which brings me to the idea of BMW bashing. I had a Ural with which I had a love-hate relationship. I hated the fact it mostly ran on one cylinder and made a horrible noise with it's gearbox and loved everything else to the point where I put the Ural chair on the Triumph. This I can fix as it only rarely has issues which mostly get fixed by swapping electrical bits. How i'd love a Ural made by Honda and sold at Triumph prices :oops2::offtopic: The point to me then with bike choice is what are you most comfortable with? I'm good with electrics but hate carbs. I have no issues with getting a blink code out of an ECU but wouldn't know a gearbox fork from a fish knife or soup spoon. To me you need to research the bikes that'll do what you need when running and find out what stops them. Then you need to learn the fixes. Technology is a matter of knowledge. Anyone out there know how to use a theodolite to find their position? A few old boys will think you are nuts for chancing your navigation to an electronic set up. Our kids will laugh at us explaining now we used to set the mixture by doing plugs chops and listening for pinking. We'll wonder what happens when the 2049 XT can't talk to Yamaha central for it's hourly update and reset for the last lot of fuel. I think the first reply says it all, go ride is the main way, but you also need to get other peoples REAL experiences. I think the myth of BMWs infalibility is as false as some of the repeated tales of over complexity. Personally I'd go for an XT, Bonneville or Bullet, but that's only because I know these in detail. If someone ran a mechanics course on Urals I'd get one. It's what YOU know that counts when you are out there. You can't buy reliability IMHO and the people who do huge trips on C90's, Harleys, Guzzis, Cagiva Elefants etc. just prove it. Andy |
Quote:
The problem on the road is finding the problem. In a workshop it's easy, just plug in and the vehicle tells you. Would you go on a big trip without a multi meter? Then why have an R1200GS a thousand miles from the nearest service tool? You can do field repairs (and the big tip; assume it's NEVER the electronic), but the skills are very different from finding a problem with an older style system. The conclusion is the same of course. Andy |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:13. |