![]() |
Seek and ye shall find........
.........that's one answer to the question; far too many people post first, asking a question that has been answered multiple times.
As a side issue, it may be that an increasing number of people want it handed to them "on a plate", saving them thinking and acting for themselves (I'm not saying that DougieB is doing this - just an example of not searching!!). In summary, the search function is very powerful. On the specific poll. It is disappointing that this poll has been here for less than a day, whereas this one:- http://www.horizonsunlimited.com/hub...od-stuff-30852 has been up for over a month with very little feedback provided. Yes, no doubt this website will have changed over the years - show me something that has not changed - and it needs to continue to evolve in order to serve its' "audience". So, my plea would be to get voting on all of the polls. For my 2 cents worth, the site will benefit from increased structure like the recent additions of recommendations for both accommodation and workshops; a general forum is not required but more structured, specific ones are - how about bike maintenance, generic, not specific to model: how many times does a recommendation for a scott oiler or whatever have to be associated with a specific model of HonYamKawaBMW? And what about the preparation of a DR650 for distance travelling in the bike tech? - most of that is generic - what I am saying here, is that the bike tech section is looking very thin. Summary: increasing content requires increased structure - sorry Grant, more work for you! |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Walkabout listed one new tech forum "Generic Bike Maintenance" perhaps - which has merit - anyone else agree? Any other forums? |
Quote:
It's at Motorcycle Repair Course and does contain some very useful information although obviously it isn't controlled by the Hubb and therefore could disappear at any time. Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
One of those thoughtful days!
Quote:
That M/C maintenance site is pretty good though and it seems to have been around for quite some time - I flagged it up a few months ago on here as well but it has not been viewed very much:- http://www.horizonsunlimited.com/hub...al-stuff-27640 Just a thought then: could you "cut a deal" with the site owner in some way and put him in here as a more formal link (no point in re-inventing round things)? As for the 4 wheel stuff; you might consider a forum for 3 wheels - you will know they have been cropping up in a number of threads recently; there is no single place to discuss sidecars, fitting the damn things, Urals etc etc. ps Yes, leave the camper vans and quads in the 4 wheel section; it's a bit like the Yam bit (which is still dominated by XTs!), with its' concentration on 4x4s. pps Suggest you move the HU feedback part of this web layout to the "top of the page", just below traveller advisories and above all of the rest - then the welcome/feedback etc is much more in peoples' faces and they might vote more often. |
I think a casual chat forum is not a bad idea.
One of the reasons I like this forum is the relative lack of aggresive wankers who respond to a genuine question from someone (OK, possibly someone naive who has done a minimum of research) with a lot of mickey taking or with that "you're not hard/adventurous/macho enough to post on this forum" pish. I always find it a little heart warming when some guy who's done a ten year multi-circumnavigation of the globe on Ural/Enfield hybrid with a wooden leg and on a budget of £6.50 takes the trouble to give a load of tips to another guy who's going to Spain on his new GS. However, inevitably there are some people who enjoy the banter and sword-play of a public forum and possibly have too much time on their hands who's posts would be better placed on a 'down the pub' style forum where they don't get in the way of the hard info. Matt :) |
Could be done, but is the juice worth the squeeze?
Quote:
Therefore, there will be no particular incentive or reason for anyone to bother with the proposed new forum, as per your last sentence - I believe the present "off topic" tendency would simply continue. I believe that the moderators would have to monitor the posts more regularly and transfer wrongly placed posts much more rigorously in order to get the new "regime" implemented; do they want that workload? |
some of us enjoy both Matt, all work n no play ya know...
Quote:
on the Other Hand.......:devil2: that I can be sometimes cant resist having a 'Dig' at those that need 'loosening up' a little. Life is for Living and Enjoying! you will all be dead soon enough anyway! so before anyone jumps at one of my comments, imagine it being said with a sly grin and a twinkle in the eye! Martyn |
I've not found the search to be very effective so far , maybe just my ineptitude .
But I've been pleasantly surprised many times whilst I have been reading threads when an unexpected gem of information is contributed by someone [and it may be completely off topic as well ] . If you try to compartmentalise [ is there such a word ?] the HUBB too much , there will be a tendency for one to just use it like an encyclopaedia and only extract knowledge and not to give knowledge as a byproduct of conversation . It has been my observation that threads labelled as being "technical" or "in search of info" very rarely go off topic . It's the threads that deal with opinions ,rather than pure facts, which tend to go astray and they seem to occur randomly . It's not so many years ago that we had no internet and therefore no internet exchange of information , however did people travel in those days ? They managed just fine I would imagine . Reading a couple of pages of pish is not much of a hassle to get valuable info on the road that might otherwise take days or even weeks to get to you by other means . I belong to a discussion group that deals with motorbike tech questions , if you want to contribute something that is off topic , you are requested to add "off topic rant " to your heading . Then a reader can be selective about what posts he views . |
Dan's sticky poll from last November
Another day, and the other poll for website feedback (which is a sticky, so it certainly does not need a "bump") has been viewed about the same number of times as this one, it has less than half as many replies as this one and it still has just 12 votes as of now.
http://www.horizonsunlimited.com/hub...od-stuff-30852 Which poll is more important? For instance, on another "off topic", does this website need an area to discuss bike racing? I have enjoyed reading, and very occasionally contributing something, about the imminent Dakar, road racing, Enduro, Trials etc etc. but I don't, personally, see a need to address these as part of specific dedicated discussion areas in the HUBB. Perhaps it does not matter; there are other websites for all of these, and they are covered in far more detail already, and this includes the subject matter of Dan's poll, as he himself says. Arguably, the whole of the HUBB can stay as it is for the random accumulation of information, opinion, rants, whatever, while the rest of HU develops the encyclopaedic knowledge base side of things. So, what Grant needs to know is which way to develop this whole website because it cannot stand still. |
the second post seems to have set the tone here, with the idea of a real traveller being somehow better than an armchair traveller. this is nothing to do with my original suggestion, I'm not interested in belittling or glorifying anyone.
It's simply, with the quantity of posts these days, after a while away it can take ages to even view the 5 pages of subjects in the 24hr view. Especially if the connection drops frequently. Adding a sub-forum for general banter, and having some way of excluding this from the general 24hr view is what I'm suggesting. But then, I guess, if more people are bantering than travelling then the majority view will be no-change, because the banter is the draw. Maybe, instead, a hubb-light/on-the-road link for a view of the forums? Create an emoticon for 'banter', which could be tagged on threads that are just that. And the on-the-road view simply excludes these types of posts from the 24hr search? hmm.. each post/reply allows you to add an icon, so people could tag their own replies as banter. Work out the banter-ratio (4 posts, 3 are banter, this thread is 75% banter), and filter on that? The 'poll' buttons should maybe be at the end of the last post, as that way you've read and can make a judgement. with the current results visible. Human nature to need things to flow in an easy order, rather than go back. |
remember this dougie....
Quote:
without the FIRST post, I couldnt have 'set the tone'. also the rest of you could have just ignored me! Always remember Dougie Old Boy, when you point the finger at someone, there are three pointed back at yourself......:innocent: Regards n best wishes Martyn |
Quote:
As with other websites, some posts may be a simple single sentence or even one or more of those smiley things, which adds to the list of postings in the last 24 hours. Fortunately, this site does not suffer from this to anything like the degree of certain others - having to wade through a pile of "non-contributions" to find the next useful reply. I use the new posts search a lot; it is very handy, but as you point out it does not discriminate in any way. Grants new search facility may offer an answer? |
Quote:
Do we have the discipline to do as you suggest in your last sentence? Will the moderators impose such discipline in the future (I have an impression that this happens more frequently in other websites than on here)? |
but what is banter...
... as we discovered when I asked a few months or so ago 'what is adventure biking'... we all have quite different ideas of what cuts the mustard...
So what is banter? How on earth would you draw the line between a thread that's about the inner workings of the latest GS suspension system, or a request for a good B&B in Eastern Outer Mongolian Russia moving on to what is the best compressor for me to buy for the garage, oh and by the way anyone heading to the NEC this weekend? See it's a minefield; and unless you have a very strict line of moderators (and who wants that?) to keep us all in line and posting in the right areas then I can't see how it would be workable. I run a very wayward list for the BBC called backstage - backstage.bbc.co.uk :: Front Page :: | and whilst not a forum (it's a mailing list) we have this piece of advice for our users. The list's House Rules are simple: Be Nice To Each Other and Don't Break The Law. If you are rude or spam the list then you'll be taken off. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:45. |