Video camera or camera?
 

Hi!
I'm busy planning and preparing for my round Africa trip. I am thinking of buying a video-camera.I'm looking at a Sony Handycam. What do you segest is better, a normal camera or a video camera? When I went to Vic-falls in '97 I took about 20 photo's of the waterfalls.I think a vedeo-camera would have been better, it gives sound and movement.

Hi,

Video camera sounds good to me too, but I would still take a still camera, at least a small point and shoot - I really like the Olymupus Mju-1/2 series, especially the straight 35mm no zoom Mju-11. Easy shirtpocket fit, always there, weatherproof, no excuses for no pic. Our Mju-1 survived 5 continents with no trouble.

One thing we noticed in many countries, we were frequently asked at the borders if we had a video camera. We always said no of course so don't know for sure how much hassle a yes would have caused.
Used to be you had to register still cameras, now they are so ubiquitous they are ignored, and I think the focus has switched to video.

Don't forget with video that unless you are experienced, you are going to getr a lot of shit, and will have to edit it out, and carry a lot of tapes, or go digital and carry a laptop. Bulk and weight and expense are the trade-off.

Having said that, we leave in a year or two, again, and will probably carry a pro 35mm camera, same one I have now, with 4 big lenses, a Mju-1 of course, a digital stil camera and/or a digital video, depending on how that shakes out before we leave. And a laptop for editing/storage of images.

If you go video I would highly recommend a course in using it and preparing shows, otherwise it's very easy to end up with the dreaded home movie syndrome - crap nobody wants to watch!

Comments from anyone who has travelled with a video camera in the third world would be welcome here!

------------------
Grant Johnson

Share the Dream!
at: www.HorizonsUnlimited.com