|
well not as easy to tell...
this tyres are made for whole different purpose...
Have used both on my LC4 for travelling and home runs... and had a very bad slip on the tarmac with the T63 regarding there narrow width and roundish shape on the back, the M21 is way wider "140/80-18" and gives a better footprint on lose ground, better traction, better warning before it slips on the road compare to the T63.... that's my opinion...
a pity, the M21 front wares out unevenly very fast on tarmac, I usually need two front tyres to one on the back, yes the T63 last much longer and wares out evenly, gives a comfortable ride.. I found it dangered too, well it doesn't mater so much, but it looks lost on the rear wheel.
I personally would never ever buy a T63 again unless there is nothing else around, just to get me further or out of the place, would rather use a TRC80 for the long howling roads and a M21 or ED660 for the fun stuff.
Tried the T63 on sand and thought what a wast on money, any other tyre is cheaper and performs better.
My mate who was riding the T63 on two journeys on his XR250 around Swedish dry gravel back roads was fine but no good on lose and muddy ground at all.
Next trip he will use some thing else but not a T63 any more. He only used the T63 regarding that he had this wildly used MoD rubber very cheap.... yes the MoD runes the T63 on there Amstrong-500 and Harley-350.....
My conclusion is that the T63 is a road tyre for small cc-size bikes, the M21 slows you down on the road but is fun on lose round and the rear rubber outlast the front by two to the front. I get 2000km on the front and 4000km on the back by caring to have the right pressure for any tyre is important anyway.
spooky
|
Linear Mode
