Go Back   Horizons Unlimited - The HUBB > Equipment, Travel > Photo Forum
Photo Forum Everything on Travel Photography, from what kind of equipment to take with you to how to light a subject.
Photo by Daniel Rintz, Himba children, Namibia

The only impossible journey
is the one
you never begin

Photo by Daniel Rintz,
Himba children, Namibia




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17 Nov 2008
Contributing Member
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Guildford, UK
Posts: 269
How to digitise 35mm negatives

I'm interested to look into digitising my 35mm film negatives. I've always been put off by the cost and time associated with the hardware plus I've just not had the time. What are the current "best" options? Storage is now cheap enough, hopefully the hardware and software is more affordable and gives the right results.....

It seems like the kind of gear that you buy, use and then sell on. Any ideas much appreciated. What has everyone else done with their negatives and slides?

Cheers.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17 Nov 2008
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Estonia
Posts: 351
Doing it well by yourself is a lot of work, I mean A LOT. There are many variables, like what quality do you expect, what size/resolution etc. If you want to have full control over the process and know how to tweak images then you can do it yourself.
It is also possible to scan all your stuff in lab, the same small digital/film minilabs that are everywhere can basically also scan your film in bulk, without making prints. From there you'll get auto-adjusted images (even film scratches and dust is removed), similar to prints from film.
I scan with my own Nikon Coolscan V film scanner, but it is slow process.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17 Nov 2008
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Estonia
Posts: 351
Wolverine F2D Film Scanner

Although too cheap ($150) to be good, there is interesting new device available:

Wolverine F2D Film Scanner

The concept is very interesting but I doubt it will deliver good results. But perhaps for mainstream customers the quality of scanned images is acceptable. I have not had a chance to see any scans from it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17 Nov 2008
AliBaba's Avatar
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,379
To get decent quality you have to use a dedicated film-scanner.
As Rebaseonu says it’s a lot of work, I have scanned 2000+ negatives and dias and it took quite some time.

If you use a good scanner and learn the basics you can get great results. I have prints in 50*75 cm and they look great!

One tip is to learn the basics before you start volume-scanning.

If you choose to do it in a shop check quality and picture-size.

BTW: I used Minolta Elite 5400
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17 Nov 2008
Gold Member
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 619
Neg or Pos?

Hi, can I ask which should be used if scanning is to be done followed my sending digital images to editor? Negative film or positive? I want to buy a used, quality film SLR camera for the first few jobs. Linzi.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17 Nov 2008
AliBaba's Avatar
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,379
With a quality scanner (high dynamic range) you can get best results with negative film, but sadly negative film is more difficult to scan so in the end the quality depends on the operator.

I have used mostly positive film so maybe that’s the reason why I struggle with negative film.

Some types of film are more difficult then other, personally I like Fuji Sensia or Fuji Velvia 50, both are positive film.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17 Nov 2008
Gold Member
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 619
Thanks

Thanks, it's down to me now to get good shots for the scanner. Linzi.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18 Nov 2008
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Salisbury UK
Posts: 248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linzi View Post
Hi, can I ask which should be used if scanning is to be done followed my sending digital images to editor? Negative film or positive? I want to buy a used, quality film SLR camera for the first few jobs. Linzi.
You can get a professional spec slr for about £50 on ebay - most of them amateur used.

Film is best chosen for the subject, not the actual scanner. Just use something you know.

Good luck.
__________________
I've a feeling I'm not in Kansas anymore.

Last edited by teflon; 18 Nov 2008 at 03:36.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 18 Nov 2008
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oxford UK
Posts: 2,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linzi View Post
Hi, can I ask which should be used if scanning is to be done followed my sending digital images to editor? Negative film or positive? I want to buy a used, quality film SLR camera for the first few jobs. Linzi.
If you're really going to go down this route don't even think about using neg film. Slide film is hard enough to digitise to acceptable standards but you'll tear your hair out trying to do the same with neg film.
Most of the diy film scanners don't really have a good enough d max for contrasty film like Velvia. They're ok for personal use but I've had pre press guys telling editors that images are not good enough for publication in the past. If you only have a few to do you'd be better off farming it out to a bureau to scan on a drum scanner.

For the cost of a good film SLR and a reasonable scanner you could probably buy a good secondhand digital SLR - Nikon D200 for example and bypass all of these problems.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 18 Nov 2008
AliBaba's Avatar
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,379
A few years ago I used a company which had a drum-scanner. The result was very good but it was expensive.
If you have a quality scanner and do your tweaking right the result is as good as most dSLRs.

Velvia is difficult to scan and it’s easy to loose details in the dark areas, especially if the exposure is not 100%.
It might be an idea to test your setup before you leave.

Now I use a dSLR and I would not say that all the “problems” are gone. You don’t have to scan anymore but the tweaking is still there. You also have to pay for backup-solutions, memory-cards++ and the camera itself is more fragile.
It’s also more expensive to get a decent wide angle (for most cameras).
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 18 Nov 2008
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oxford UK
Posts: 2,102
I may be coming at this from a different perspective as this kind of stuff has been my day job for the last 20+ years and usually it's anything for an easy life / time is money etc.

Very few of the magazines / P.R. agencies etc I've worked for would accept images shot on neg film unless they were really desperate for that image and even then the printed results were frequently poor.

If the image was shot on tranny film they would want the original to scan themselves as a lot of pre press companies ran a closed system that was internally consistent but could produce off colours etc if the scan came in from outside. If you insisted on sending your own scan data they would want you to take financial responsibility for the press run in case the results were unacceptable - something, fairly obviously, you would never do.

Since digital cameras have become widespread everybody is now used to receiving RGB digital files but they have to be in the right colour space etc. I've not shot 35 mm film of any sort for 7 or 8 yrs now so I've no recent experience but I do wonder if editors / pre press are still used to dealing with transparencies in the way they used to be. I'm sure there are some specialist publications that are but a lot of general, backs to the wall financially magazines may not want the added expense of paying for a scan but would be unhappy when a supplied tranny scan reproduces badly.

Tweaking digital camera files is a LOT (about x10) quicker than scanning / correcting tranny film and imho unless you're using medium format film (and then scanning costs go through the roof) the quality from dSLRs is much better than from scanned 35mm slides - even drum scanned ones. For me the break even point was around 5 - 6m pixels equaling scanned 35mm quality.

Bottom line is, I suppose, don't make a rod for your own back. If you're starting from scratch doing what what is normal industry practice makes life a lot easier.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 18 Nov 2008
AliBaba's Avatar
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,379
Thanks, nice to see how a professional thinks.
I have done some comments based on my experience making a few articles the last 7 years.

Quote:
Originally Posted by backofbeyond View Post
Very few of the magazines / P.R. agencies etc I've worked for would accept images shot on neg film unless they were really desperate for that image and even then the printed results were frequently poor.
In my experience this was valid when you delivered the film directly to the magazine, and I think it had technical reasons.
Nowadays you give them a file and it’s the quality of the picture that counts. It doesn’t matter if you have used positive film, negative film or a digital camera.
But it is easier to get a good scan on positive film.

Quote:
Originally Posted by backofbeyond View Post
If the image was shot on tranny film they would want the original to scan themselves as a lot of pre press companies ran a closed system that was internally consistent but could produce off colours etc if the scan came in from outside. If you insisted on sending your own scan data they would want you to take financial responsibility for the press run in case the results were unacceptable - something, fairly obviously, you would never do.
Since 2003 (when the Mag I write for wanted files instead of positive film) they wanted me to provide the scan.
But I’m sure it can be different and I think it’s vise to talk to the customers before you go on a trip. Show them some pictures and ask if that’s how they like it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by backofbeyond View Post
Since digital cameras have become widespread everybody is now used to receiving RGB digital files but they have to be in the right colour space etc. I've not shot 35 mm film of any sort for 7 or 8 yrs now so I've no recent experience but I do wonder if editors / pre press are still used to dealing with transparencies in the way they used to be. I'm sure there are some specialist publications that are but a lot of general, backs to the wall financially magazines may not want the added expense of paying for a scan but would be unhappy when a supplied tranny scan reproduces badly.
I don’t think most of them are used to deal with film anymore, but you hand them the file so that’s not a problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by backofbeyond View Post
Tweaking digital camera files is a LOT (about x10) quicker than scanning / correcting tranny film and imho unless you're using medium format film (and then scanning costs go through the roof) the quality from dSLRs is much better than from scanned 35mm slides - even drum scanned ones. For me the break even point was around 5 - 6m pixels equaling scanned 35mm quality.
Yes the analog workflow is slow and painful. For someone who works with this on daily basis it’s far to slow. For someone that publishes 20 pictures a year it doesn’t matter that much.

As you know the breaking point is hard to define. I have made picture in 50*75 cm based on Velvia 50 and I have not managed to get the same quality from my 10MPIX dSLR. But the dSLR is much better then Sensia 200.


Quote:
Originally Posted by backofbeyond View Post
Bottom line is, I suppose, don't make a rod for your own back. If you're starting from scratch doing what what is normal industry practice makes life a lot easier.
Yes I agree, if you can fork out the cash.

My point is that both analog and digital cameras are up to the job, digital has a higher entry-level price and analog requires more work.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 18 Nov 2008
Gold Member
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 619
Specific

Hi, my needs just now are very specific. I have a tight deadline to meet, little cash to play with and must produce publishable quality. I'm going for a used Canon EOS film, pro quality colour ASA 400 and need to produce the goods. Later, after a breather, I'll look into it more closely. My main concern is why do banks make it so difficult to rob them these days when you need cash fast? How selfish can you get? Linzi.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 18 Nov 2008
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Salisbury UK
Posts: 248
Quote:
Originally Posted by backofbeyond View Post
... I've no recent experience but I do wonder if editors / pre press are still used to dealing with transparencies in the way they used to be...
Used to be medium format for cover/centre page and digi for the rest. Just handed the jpegs over at the end of the day and sent the processed film later, but that was a couple of years ago. Was actually given a drum scanner. Only a small one, but still £40000 when it was new - just not today.

This thread's taken a turn. Poor Matt.:confused1:
__________________
I've a feeling I'm not in Kansas anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 18 Nov 2008
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Salisbury UK
Posts: 248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linzi View Post
Hi, my needs just now are very specific. I have a tight deadline to meet, little cash to play with and must produce publishable quality. I'm going for a used Canon EOS film, pro quality colour ASA 400 and need to produce the goods. Later, after a breather, I'll look into it more closely. My main concern is why do banks make it so difficult to rob them these days when you need cash fast? How selfish can you get? Linzi.
Good luck Linzi. Break a leg an' all that.
__________________
I've a feeling I'm not in Kansas anymore.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 Registered Users and/or Members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
35mm SLR or Compact mcluretaylor Photo Forum 6 10 May 2003 15:50
What to look for in a 35mm slide film (for africa)? john-l Photo Forum 4 21 Dec 2001 17:58
35mm developed digitally strikingviking Photo Forum 1 11 Sep 2001 10:35
Opinions traded here - 35mm Rich K Photo Forum 0 4 Jun 2001 06:22

 
 

Announcements

Thinking about traveling? Not sure about the whole thing? Watch the HU Achievable Dream Video Trailers and then get ALL the information you need to get inspired and learn how to travel anywhere in the world!

Have YOU ever wondered who has ridden around the world? We did too - and now here's the list of Circumnavigators!
Check it out now
, and add your information if we didn't find you.

Next HU Eventscalendar

HU Event and other updates on the HUBB Forum "Traveller's Advisories" thread.
ALL Dates subject to change.

2024:

Add yourself to the Updates List for each event!

Questions about an event? Ask here

HUBBUK: info

See all event details

 
World's most listened to Adventure Motorbike Show!
Check the RAW segments; Grant, your HU host is on every month!
Episodes below to listen to while you, err, pretend to do something or other...

2020 Edition of Chris Scott's Adventure Motorcycling Handbook.

2020 Edition of Chris Scott's Adventure Motorcycling Handbook.

"Ultimate global guide for red-blooded bikers planning overseas exploration. Covers choice & preparation of best bike, shipping overseas, baggage design, riding techniques, travel health, visas, documentation, safety and useful addresses." Recommended. (Grant)



Ripcord Rescue Travel Insurance.

Ripcord Rescue Travel Insurance™ combines into a single integrated program the best evacuation and rescue with the premier travel insurance coverages designed for adventurers.

Led by special operations veterans, Stanford Medicine affiliated physicians, paramedics and other travel experts, Ripcord is perfect for adventure seekers, climbers, skiers, sports enthusiasts, hunters, international travelers, humanitarian efforts, expeditions and more.

Ripcord travel protection is now available for ALL nationalities, and travel is covered on motorcycles of all sizes!


 

What others say about HU...

"This site is the BIBLE for international bike travelers." Greg, Australia

"Thank you! The web site, The travels, The insight, The inspiration, Everything, just thanks." Colin, UK

"My friend and I are planning a trip from Singapore to England... We found (the HU) site invaluable as an aid to planning and have based a lot of our purchases (bikes, riding gear, etc.) on what we have learned from this site." Phil, Australia

"I for one always had an adventurous spirit, but you and Susan lit the fire for my trip and I'll be forever grateful for what you two do to inspire others to just do it." Brent, USA

"Your website is a mecca of valuable information and the (video) series is informative, entertaining, and inspiring!" Jennifer, Canada

"Your worldwide organisation and events are the Go To places to for all serious touring and aspiring touring bikers." Trevor, South Africa

"This is the answer to all my questions." Haydn, Australia

"Keep going the excellent work you are doing for Horizons Unlimited - I love it!" Thomas, Germany

Lots more comments here!



Five books by Graham Field!

Diaries of a compulsive traveller
by Graham Field
Book, eBook, Audiobook

"A compelling, honest, inspiring and entertaining writing style with a built-in feel-good factor" Get them NOW from the authors' website and Amazon.com, Amazon.ca, Amazon.co.uk.



Back Road Map Books and Backroad GPS Maps for all of Canada - a must have!

New to Horizons Unlimited?

New to motorcycle travelling? New to the HU site? Confused? Too many options? It's really very simple - just 4 easy steps!

Horizons Unlimited was founded in 1997 by Grant and Susan Johnson following their journey around the world on a BMW R80G/S.

Susan and Grant Johnson Read more about Grant & Susan's story

Membership - help keep us going!

Horizons Unlimited is not a big multi-national company, just two people who love motorcycle travel and have grown what started as a hobby in 1997 into a full time job (usually 8-10 hours per day and 7 days a week) and a labour of love. To keep it going and a roof over our heads, we run events all over the world with the help of volunteers; we sell inspirational and informative DVDs; we have a few selected advertisers; and we make a small amount from memberships.

You don't have to be a Member to come to an HU meeting, access the website, or ask questions on the HUBB. What you get for your membership contribution is our sincere gratitude, good karma and knowing that you're helping to keep the motorcycle travel dream alive. Contributing Members and Gold Members do get additional features on the HUBB. Here's a list of all the Member benefits on the HUBB.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:11.