Go Back   Horizons Unlimited - The HUBB > Equipment, Travel > Photo Forum
Photo Forum Everything on Travel Photography, from what kind of equipment to take with you to how to light a subject.
Photo by Daniel Rintz, Himba children, Namibia

The only impossible journey
is the one
you never begin

Photo by Daniel Rintz,
Himba children, Namibia




Like Tree2Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 14 Sep 2013
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I S T
Posts: 655
For CPL, if possible should stick to good brands you mentioned. Also with ND's.

For graduals I am not sure.

Here are some examples of B+W CPL landscapes which cost around 120 + Euros.

Graduals are with 3-5 usd Chinese ones. When I open them 100 %, don't see any problem with them.

IR is with a B+W 93 200+ Euro BW IR filter...

By the way need to aware that Kenko and Hoya filters made in Philippines...
Probably will give a visit to Kenko factory in Philippines next month
Attached Thumbnails
Ask a photographer...-b-w_cpl.jpg  

Ask a photographer...-b-w_cpl_2.jpg  

Ask a photographer...-b-w_cpl_3.jpg  

Ask a photographer...-b-w_cpl_4.jpg  

Ask a photographer...-b-w_cpl_5.jpg  

Ask a photographer...-b-w_nd-cpl.jpg  

Ask a photographer...-5-_chinese_gradual2.jpg  

Ask a photographer...-5-_chinese_gradual3.jpg  

Ask a photographer...-5-_chinese_gradual.jpg  

Ask a photographer...-ayasofya_ir_neg.jpg  

__________________
"where the traveller goes, nobody knows ! "
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 15 Sep 2013
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Estonia
Posts: 787
First: sorry for more offtopic!

Very nice landscapes Sami, definitely looks like that 120EUR is well spent IMO


Quote:
Originally Posted by Samy View Post
Same like, can you easily carry a D800E or Eos5dII in your tankbag?

By the way very nice MF pictures and good scans. What MF camera you have?

I have a Hassy but will need a digital back in few years
I wouldn't be able to buy those expensive FF dslrs with equally worth lenses. Well okay I could if I pushed really hard but I would rather travel months in a row for the price of those cameras and lenses you mentioned.

I use an old Pentax 67, which is almost as old as I am. Looks like crap with paint worn, dented, screws missing and other bits falling off. But it has endured over 200 000 km of motorcycle travel, 6 continents, pictured over 80 countries. Worked flawlessly from -35C to +45 and in extreme altitude/humidity conditions, vibrations, dust, sand, crashes and all this on a bike. A fully mechanical camera but still working after some 30 years of abuse. Lot of big-$$$ digital people laugh a lot on my old camera but it has hard-earned my respect so I probably have to take it into my own grave.

I'm no pro photographer. Even if I could afford Hassleblad with a digital back the very first thing I'd do is bin the digital back not to undermine this fine camera system. Nothing compares to film to its artistic yet organic look, and all the digital "film-look"/grain simulations and emulations through software look straight-out rediculous if you ask me. It's like comparing a sound of a digital (-ly emulating) piano to a acoustic grand piano for me.

I work in technology field so while I still use digital camera for documenting I've gotten very tired of digital and the latest/greatest technology trends, to sterile/clinical looks of images, overprocessing in PP till the consumerist philosophy with the digital cameras. So it's my personal "bad" choice (more like a sin, actually). I wouldn't recommend analog photography to anybody looking for a convenience though, since it's a lot more work and patience involved.

As told I'm no pro who needs to shoot a lot of pictures on daily basis so ironically with all the today's convenience of digital I've switched from digital to film so I'm one of those few idiots left who still shoots film as preferred media on my travels and often laughted at. With film the filters are very usable if not mandatory for the color slide work since you don't have the (mathematically cheated-) flexibility of the digital and some slide films have very low dynamic range that just beg to use gradients and since you can observe the MF media with your own eyes against the light with slide film you can immediely make a difference between a good quality or bad optical quality gradient filter.















I love to work with color negatives on people where cooling or waming filters work depending on lightning conditions:





Also B&W films I often prefer through color filters, i.e.:








B&W infrared on film looks different to digital IR:

















Colour infrared on analog film is also possible but this looks very different from any digital infrared weather with or without of digital software emulations or simulations I've seen so far trying to simulate Kodak EIR:




A simple scan from Kodak Aerochrome (EIR) infrared slide film - no manipulations, the frame looks exacly the same vivid-red when you inspect the slide aginst the light with your own eyes.



All pics from the same around 30 years old Pentax 67 camera,
Margus
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 15 Sep 2013
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oxford UK
Posts: 2,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Margus View Post
Nothing compares to film to its artistic yet organic look, and all the digital "film-look"/grain simulations

As told I'm no pro who needs to shoot a lot of pictures on daily basis so ironically with all the today's convenience of digital I've switched from digital to film so I'm one of those few idiots left who still shoots film as preferred media on my travels and often laughted at.

Strangely enough I was just talking to a fellow photographer on that very subject just this morning as we were in the process of knocking out about 7-8000 photographs at an event. I was telling him that good though the files from his D800 are there is something about the tonal quality that I used to get from medium format film in my Mamiya RB67 that I've never seen in digital. He couldn't disagree as, as a bloke in his 20's, he'd never used a medium format camera and shooting any type of film was nothing more than a distant memory.

He did point out though that we'd have got through a fairly large number of rolls of film if we'd been shooting on medium format this morning and that putting them on the internet by 9.00am tomorrow might be a little difficult, especially as they have to go through a service company in New Zealand overnight to construct a searchable database. That's the reality of a lot of professional photography nowadays. The days when I used to run my own processing lab and came back with 15 -20 rolls of film from an event are long gone. Neither do I miss the worry of keeping 20-30 rolls of exposed E6 film cool enough to prevent colour shifts in the middle of the Sahara.

Also long gone is the infrastructure that underpinned professional film photography. Every single one of the professional labs within about 30 miles of me have shut down. Medium format film is now close to three times the price it used to be and only available from a few specialist suppliers. The last batch of 120 size Ilford B/W film I bought was supplied from Israel. I used to able to get it in the local High St. Unless you're operating in some unique backwater of the photographic universe (as I occasionally do) film is dead and pretty close to buried. These days I can hear people audibly gulp on the phone when I give them a quote to shoot their wedding on film compared to digital. Retro chic is only popular when it doesn't cost any more.

Some (most) of the m.f. images that people have scanned and posted above are really great shots and I'm both impressed and jealous - but - the problem is they've had to be scanned to put them on here. Even when I was shooting a lot of film for magazines, advertising etc I never saw the result of a scan - even a high end drum scan - that didn't degrade the image compared to what you saw in the original. Sure, digital is processed to within an inch of its life, either in camera or via Photoshop but the world is now set up to deal with those files and maintain some sort of fidelity either in printing or press pre production. The craft skills that were common to do the same with film 15 -20 yrs ago are going the same way as heavy engineering etc (in the UK anyway) - only a few older people can remember what to do.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 16 Sep 2013
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Estonia
Posts: 787
Don't hold a grudge against me but funny, I keep hearing the same BS almost on daily basis how film is dead and impossible. In fact I've heard that same exact story already some 5+ years in a row while I've kept calm and just shot film Nothing's changed much. I have first hand experience to say the film is dead but it just won't lay down. Meaning it's still a working alternative and dirt cheap (and equipment that used to cost zillion dollars you get almost for free) for those few who dare.

Let there be said I'm from a younger generation who started with digital and used to be a very-pro digital person but ironically somehow ended up working with film as a preferred media. (I still shoot digital though, but much prefer the looks of film over digital any day of the week)

It looks this "buried" "no-infrastructure" talk mostly come from people who do not shoot film on a daily basis so all they do is speculate without their own first-hand experience and logically they ignore experience from those few who still work with this medium and still keep speculating how bad it (well more like in their own minds: "supposed") to be. This is what I've seen and heard in those years under the "film is dead" slogan.

While I do carry a small digital with me on travels for documenting it's a good thing I'm not a pro. Just a humble guy. I do not need to shoot thousands of shots, I shoot just few. I.e. one good photo from one event is enough for me. And I don't like too many photos to choose between. I develop myself (even both C41 and E6) when I'm home, when I was travelling for 3 years I sent the rolls home every 3-4 months to a friend who developed them for me. Scanning and posting to internet for me to DL done there as well. The same could be done through labs that still work. Never lost a roll on shipping. Also it's funny, I've never had problems with film even spending a lot of time in Sahara, even with the fragile E6 films Never had sourcing problems either, there's a lot of analog webshops (i.e. I've been working with those depending where I am 1, 2, 3, 4 and there are many others analog-specialized shops WW) with all the produced film available and they're shipping worldwide, express (just couple of days when you're in a hurry) or normal, I used the latter by planning ahead. Although I did carry all the rolls with me sometimes I used local shops as well i.e. when I was in Kuala Lumpur or shipped film from Europe to Oman when I was travelling there. In my 3 years of RTW there was not a single case I was out of film or having problems with it.

Even with developing or remote place shipping I consider shooting film dirt-cheap considering the unique (from artistic point of view in today's digital-dominated world) analog results I get and comparing the costs of buying i.e. decent D800E or 5DmkIII etc with equal lenses, let alone a proper digital MF gear. My ancient MF camera gear is worth probably couple of hundred euros tops, it's highly dependable yet expendable when you lose it or gets stolen (good thing none want's this oldschool PoS). So I never really understood the fuss about shooting film being expensive.

Storage: ironically I've lost way more important digital files from my SD or HD than I've ever lost film (i.e. bad development or a lost/damaged roll) so rather than being virtual it being a physical entity I consider the storage is actually a pro for film since the media will outlive me while if you'd speculate like digital guys about film the other way around: it takes just one average Sunspot towards Earth to take down all servers, cloud systems and personal computers to destroy most of digital data stored. We all can speculate about things we don't know much about, right!?

Not trying to say everybody should shoot film and I already said above I don't recommend analog photography to anybody looking for convenience. Let this not be another pointless "digital vs film" BSing. For an average person a digital gear is hands down the best and most convenient choice in practice. But what I'm saying is in the end of the day the medium is a tool for artistry and a personal choice to be fit in, i.e. like digital pianos dominate in today's world the "absolete" acoustic piano still holds a valuable niche in the creation of music today, and it's similar situation for film. Thus, IMHO, the film still is definitely a working and very interesting alternative for those keen artists or enthusiasts who want to be fundamentally different in their artistic approaches or for the people who are just tired of all the endless running, digital hype, manufacturer's lobbying and "you just need the latest model" mentality or consumerism.

IMHO again,
Margus

Last edited by Margus; 16 Sep 2013 at 09:28.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 16 Sep 2013
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oxford UK
Posts: 2,102
I agree - film isn't dead but it isn't dead in the same way that vinyl isn't dead or bikes from the 1920's are kept going by a band of enthusiasts. I still shoot film, I still have a collection of old LPs (plus a record deck to play them) and a collection of older bikes / cars but when it comes to making my living 99.9% of what I produce comes from a digital original. The 0.1% comes from the occasional job I have for an events agency where the team challenge is to build a set and use genuine 1860's camera equipment to shoot a calendar picture. That involves me hand making / processing glass plate negs - after a day spent doing that even roll film looks state of the art.

It's probably wrong to say there's no infrastructure for film these days. I'm sure there are suppliers of film and labs around to process it but they are far far fewer than they used to be - certainly round my area in the south of England. When I was using large quantities of film I ran my own lab for about 10yrs and there was also a back up world behind the scenes doing quality checks on your chemistry, daily deliveries of paper, chemicals etc. Just about every single company that I dealt with in these areas has closed down. Film processing is now pretty much a craft skill rather than an industry employing technical staff. I've not yet seen evening classes in c41 processing advertised but that's the way it'll go (= cynical comment).

Like the demise of horse drawn buses when petrol powered ones came along digital cameras have enabled people who make their living in this area to do more, more quickly and far cheaper than what was possible previously. You would not believe the difference in the economics of my working life when I changed from film to digital. The cost of the cameras was almost small change in that equation - the £4500 I spent on my first digital SLR was recouped within three months on one job alone. That's the reality of it - whether I like using film or not (I do) is irrelevant, if I want to make a living these days I shoot digital unless I can find a corner of the market (like the example above) where the film and chemistry skills I honed over twenty years can be used in such a way that someone will pay me to practice them. For me these days any film I shoot has the cash flow usually going in the other direction - it's not a problem as I enjoy it as a hobby.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 16 Sep 2013
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I S T
Posts: 655
Hello Margus,

Can you say me which pictures are shot on film in my prior post ?

I still keep my LF, MF and 35mm cameras, lenses and film backs... But I don't shoot film. You know why? It is not logic ! Can't find different films I need easily here where I live. And can't have films developed in quality that easy and cheap like before.

Ok, agree, film has better quality, toning and color depth. How much different to digital? % 20? % 50?

Come on, digital is easy. Easy to store, retouch and FAST.

I still have many films I didn't scan yet... many... and it is time consuming... crazy time and effort. Though I have a professional scanner at home. Also need to caliber it sometimes....

Don't know if I will ever use those film cameras again... and huge number of lenses which cost me a fortune... Happy with digital system. But miss my MF and LF pictures...

That's life... We will have difficulty to walk someday... and die too. We have to accept and face that...

Happy shootings whichever you like...
__________________
"where the traveller goes, nobody knows ! "
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 16 Sep 2013
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I S T
Posts: 655
And still best cinematography is shot on film, 35 mm and 4x5" (IMAX).

Though there are 4000x6000 shooting digital camera systems (EPIC & RED).


In movie sector, still, film is the best !
__________________
"where the traveller goes, nobody knows ! "
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 16 Sep 2013
Contributing Member
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aus. Qld. Mackay
Posts: 474
I carry a Canon 5D mkiii, & a Canon FX 105 as I do alot of film as well, lens: 50mm Prime, 11-16, 24-70, 70-300 (+extender) My wife carries a 7D. As for filters after my first trip I left them all at home as you can do everything & more in post these days. We also carry a couple of mics & a Zoom. A carbon fibre tripod is a must if your serious. If you are a photographer you will kick yourself for taking crap gear whether it is for work or play, if you are passionate about it work & play are the same anyway.

Just my 2 bob on the subject !!!

Cheers
paul
__________________
....rather Die Living.....than Live Dying !
www.globetrekkers.net.au
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 16 Sep 2013
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Estonia
Posts: 787
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulD View Post
If you are a photographer you will kick yourself for taking crap gear whether it is for work or play, if you are passionate about it work & play are the same anyway.
This sums it up just nicely I reckon :]

(also good to hear I'm not the only idiot in the (overlanders-) village who travels with film these days)
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 6 Oct 2013
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I S T
Posts: 655
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulD View Post
I carry a Canon 5D mkiii, & a Canon FX 105 as I do alot of film as well, lens: 50mm Prime, 11-16, 24-70, 70-300 (+extender) My wife carries a 7D. As for filters after my first trip I left them all at home as you can do everything & more in post these days. We also carry a couple of mics & a Zoom. A carbon fibre tripod is a must if your serious. If you are a photographer you will kick yourself for taking crap gear whether it is for work or play, if you are passionate about it work & play are the same anyway.

Just my 2 bob on the subject !!!

Cheers
paul
Need lots of space and cash to have and carry all those gear

__________________
"where the traveller goes, nobody knows ! "
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 1 Apr 2014
Registered Users
New on the HUBB
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 13
Hello everyone I don't know if Im posting in a right thread but I've read ask a photographer so I'm asking. can anyone give me an advice about ZENIT cameras? I want to buy old zenit camera and I don't know which is a good model or what I must know not get cheated by a seller? can I test lens somehow?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 2 Apr 2014
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oxford UK
Posts: 2,102
Its been quite some time since I last had a Zenit but I do remember them as being the perfect multi purpose travel camera; not only can you take pictures but you can use them as a hammer - for knocking in tent pegs for example, or for propping the bike up on soft ground etc

Any particular reason why you particularly want a Zenit? The couple I owned (back in the 70's) were very solidly made but with somewhat variable quality control. They were quite crude compared to the Japanese opposition but their main advantage was that they used M42 screw lenses that were cheap on the secondhand market so it didn't cost much to build up a usable set. Ok in a retro Lomo sort of way would be my conclusion these days but really don't pay much.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 4 Apr 2014
Registered Users
New on the HUBB
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by backofbeyond View Post
Its been quite some time since I last had a Zenit but I do remember them as being the perfect multi purpose travel camera; not only can you take pictures but you can use them as a hammer - for knocking in tent pegs for example, or for propping the bike up on soft ground etc

Any particular reason why you particularly want a Zenit? The couple I owned (back in the 70's) were very solidly made but with somewhat variable quality control. They were quite crude compared to the Japanese opposition but their main advantage was that they used M42 screw lenses that were cheap on the secondhand market so it didn't cost much to build up a usable set. Ok in a retro Lomo sort of way would be my conclusion these days but really don't pay much.

I want exactly zenit because of ot's quality of pictures it's got some natural noisy effect that I like so much, it does focusing really good, some of my zenit photos has such a good bokehs I love them, so it's photos need retouching in photoshop very rare I like it's natural quality very much and somehow I'm more photogenic with Zenit
lol about using it as a hammer good idea
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 4 Apr 2014
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 679
Ask a photographer...

To be honest it's almost certainly the film which gives you the 'noise' (called grain in analog terms, noise is more to describe distortion from digital sensors), if not then it is from either under or over exposing, or from doing something wrong in the lab (or right if grain is your thing).

I'm almost sure that the camera you use will not affect grain, even my 12 dollar Holgas will throw out perfectly smooth photos with the right film and exposure. As for bokeh, using a fast lens (ie 2.8 or lower), generally gets you nice bokeh though some lenses are better than other. My 1932 Leica IIIa has wonderful bokeh with its 3.5 lens.

Indeed, if you just feel more of a photographer with a Zenit I would say that is a perfectly good reason to buy one. There is not a lot to go wrong with the old film cameras and your biggest concern should be if the shutter speeds are firing correctly. You can measure this accurately down to a certain speed by recording the sound with computer software and then working out the pattern in the sound wave, but you'll need to get it serviced to know for sure. Just running a test film through it will work too.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 Registered Users and/or Members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Photographer route de grande alpes Andysr6 Travellers' questions that don't fit anywhere else 1 25 Jul 2012 07:12
Being kidnapped. A sober thought goodwoodweirdo The HUBB PUB 64 13 Aug 2010 09:51

 
 

Announcements

Thinking about traveling? Not sure about the whole thing? Watch the HU Achievable Dream Video Trailers and then get ALL the information you need to get inspired and learn how to travel anywhere in the world!

Have YOU ever wondered who has ridden around the world? We did too - and now here's the list of Circumnavigators!
Check it out now
, and add your information if we didn't find you.

Next HU Eventscalendar

HU Event and other updates on the HUBB Forum "Traveller's Advisories" thread.
ALL Dates subject to change.

2024:

Add yourself to the Updates List for each event!

Questions about an event? Ask here

HUBBUK: info

See all event details

 
World's most listened to Adventure Motorbike Show!
Check the RAW segments; Grant, your HU host is on every month!
Episodes below to listen to while you, err, pretend to do something or other...

2020 Edition of Chris Scott's Adventure Motorcycling Handbook.

2020 Edition of Chris Scott's Adventure Motorcycling Handbook.

"Ultimate global guide for red-blooded bikers planning overseas exploration. Covers choice & preparation of best bike, shipping overseas, baggage design, riding techniques, travel health, visas, documentation, safety and useful addresses." Recommended. (Grant)



Ripcord Rescue Travel Insurance.

Ripcord Rescue Travel Insurance™ combines into a single integrated program the best evacuation and rescue with the premier travel insurance coverages designed for adventurers.

Led by special operations veterans, Stanford Medicine affiliated physicians, paramedics and other travel experts, Ripcord is perfect for adventure seekers, climbers, skiers, sports enthusiasts, hunters, international travelers, humanitarian efforts, expeditions and more.

Ripcord travel protection is now available for ALL nationalities, and travel is covered on motorcycles of all sizes!


 

What others say about HU...

"This site is the BIBLE for international bike travelers." Greg, Australia

"Thank you! The web site, The travels, The insight, The inspiration, Everything, just thanks." Colin, UK

"My friend and I are planning a trip from Singapore to England... We found (the HU) site invaluable as an aid to planning and have based a lot of our purchases (bikes, riding gear, etc.) on what we have learned from this site." Phil, Australia

"I for one always had an adventurous spirit, but you and Susan lit the fire for my trip and I'll be forever grateful for what you two do to inspire others to just do it." Brent, USA

"Your website is a mecca of valuable information and the (video) series is informative, entertaining, and inspiring!" Jennifer, Canada

"Your worldwide organisation and events are the Go To places to for all serious touring and aspiring touring bikers." Trevor, South Africa

"This is the answer to all my questions." Haydn, Australia

"Keep going the excellent work you are doing for Horizons Unlimited - I love it!" Thomas, Germany

Lots more comments here!



Five books by Graham Field!

Diaries of a compulsive traveller
by Graham Field
Book, eBook, Audiobook

"A compelling, honest, inspiring and entertaining writing style with a built-in feel-good factor" Get them NOW from the authors' website and Amazon.com, Amazon.ca, Amazon.co.uk.



Back Road Map Books and Backroad GPS Maps for all of Canada - a must have!

New to Horizons Unlimited?

New to motorcycle travelling? New to the HU site? Confused? Too many options? It's really very simple - just 4 easy steps!

Horizons Unlimited was founded in 1997 by Grant and Susan Johnson following their journey around the world on a BMW R80G/S.

Susan and Grant Johnson Read more about Grant & Susan's story

Membership - help keep us going!

Horizons Unlimited is not a big multi-national company, just two people who love motorcycle travel and have grown what started as a hobby in 1997 into a full time job (usually 8-10 hours per day and 7 days a week) and a labour of love. To keep it going and a roof over our heads, we run events all over the world with the help of volunteers; we sell inspirational and informative DVDs; we have a few selected advertisers; and we make a small amount from memberships.

You don't have to be a Member to come to an HU meeting, access the website, or ask questions on the HUBB. What you get for your membership contribution is our sincere gratitude, good karma and knowing that you're helping to keep the motorcycle travel dream alive. Contributing Members and Gold Members do get additional features on the HUBB. Here's a list of all the Member benefits on the HUBB.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:21.