Contact Overland Solutions for all your custom modifications and setup for overland travel.               Discover the extraordinary with Compass Expeditions.

Go Back   The HUBB > Equipment, Travel > Navigation - Maps, Compass, GPS
Standard GPS format?? Standard GPS format??
Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Navigation - Maps, Compass, GPS How to find your way - traditional map, compass and road signs, or GPS and more
With more than 58 destinations worldwide, Edelweiss Bike Travel is Number 1 in guided motorcycle tours!
World-wide topographic maps for your Android Smartphone

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 1 May 2007
Grant Johnson's Avatar
Administrator
Veteran HUBBer
  
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 3,929
Standard GPS format??
It's been suggested

"a suggestion if I may.
Is there any way to encourage individuals (HU community
ditto) to use a standard format for Lat & Longitude ? for
example :
N51 30.729 W0 03.904 (london) ?
it would make like (cut & paste) soooooo much simpler IMHO. Bertrand"

MY question as a non-regular GPS user is: What IS the most common format?

IS WGS84 the standard WORLD-wide or?

What should HUBBers try to standardise on or is it a hopeless task?

Let me know the common formats and I'll post a poll to get a vote on it.

thanks!
__________________
Grant Johnson

Seek, and ye shall find.
------------------------

One world, Two wheels
www.HorizonsUnlimited.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 1 May 2007
Stephano's Avatar
Contributing Member
Veteran HUBBer
  
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Greenwich
Posts: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant Johnson View Post
"it would make like (cut & paste) soooooo much simpler IMHO. Bertrand"
Seems like a good idea. I'm in favour of the above London example as it matches the Garmin Mapsource format so you can paste it straight into a waypoint and it works.
Stephan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 1 May 2007
Bertrand's Avatar
Happiness is a hot shower!
Veteran HUBBer
  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,049
Talking Wgs84
Thanks for putting up the post Grant
and my vote goes to WGS84
( but then I'm biased!) and like Stephano correctly points out....it matches the Map Source format!
and as degrees and minutes (DD MM,MMM) eg: N51 30.729 W0 03.904 (london)
__________________
Motivational beating will continue until morale improves
Last edited by Bertrand; 3 May 2007 at 08:49. Reason: updating degrees and minutes
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 1 May 2007
Registered Users
Veteran HUBBer
  
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Paide, Estonia
Posts: 348
Coordinate display
Quote:
MY question as a non-regular GPS user is: What IS the most common format?

IS WGS84 the standard WORLD-wide or?

WGS84 is not a format that causes most confusion, as it is actually default map datum in many applications and GPS hardware. It is good idea to have it as default unless you want to use some exotic maps that use different grid (soviet military maps etc).

The actual problem in the internet is showing/writing the same point coordinates in different ways:

1) As decimal degrees (D,DDDDD): N 58.88482°, E 25.56835 °
2) As degrees and minutes (DD MM,MMM): N 58° 53.089', E 25 ° 34.101'
3) As degrees, minutes and seconds (DD MM SS,S): N 58° 53' 5.3 ", E 25 ° 34' 6.1 "

All the above are referring exactly the same location. You can cange your GPS to display which format you prefer, however, beware of entering coordinates in "wrong" format as this will cause errors.

Which of the above 3 is best? Hard to tell, but if I remember right default Garmin setup is DD MM,MMM (example 2 above). But to use Google Maps API for example, you pass decimal coordinates (D,DDDDD) that makes the application easy to process them as there is no need to convert from minutes and seconds. Also I think most GPS hardware and software store point coordinates as D,DDDDD internally, the other formats will just be displayed on demand (by converting).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 9 May 2007
mmaarten's Avatar
Gold Member
Veteran HUBBer
  
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: in Samaipata, Boliva
Posts: 577
Talking many digits, many mistakes
My 2 cents:

WGS84 seems to be the most used map-datum and it is important since it converts de coordinates into a location. Having the wrong datum takes you to the wrong spot on the map, but two people using different datums is more confusing.

As for the format I absolutely prefer the DD.MM.mmm version.
In the metric system we do not use more then 3 digits in a row since that is the maximum amount of digits the human eye (read brain) can "read in a glance". With more than 3 digits most people need to count the position and need to "remember them" in more than one pass.

Also I would prefer "all digits" so london would be N 51 30.729 W 000 03.904 and not N51 30.729 W0 03.904.
It shows what kind of format is used more clearly.

The "old system" DD.MM.SS is just not acurate enough for modern devices.

Ofcourse this is only my very humble opinion.

Maarten
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 9 May 2007
Redboots's Avatar
Contributing Member
Veteran HUBBer
  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 773
Thumbs up Decimal Degrees
As in hddd.ddddd as in: N58.88482, E25.56835 would be simplest.
Its also the one Google maps uses so there exists a load of references.

I use a site called POI66 and that is also the format they use.
My (garmin) GPS is also set to that.

WGS 84 is the reference system being used by the Global Positioning Systems. It is geocentric and globally consistent within ±1 m.
So it would seem good sense to use it

John
__________________
JAMBA 2007 - bikerbytes.com/txp
Last edited by Redboots; 9 May 2007 at 08:22. Reason: crap spelling!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16 May 2007
Registered Users
New on the HUBB
  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Amsterdam, NL
Posts: 2
Hi,
from what I found out:
WGS84 is the 'map datum'. Dat means every latitude/longitude will bring you to a certain location. Using NAD27 would give a different location for the same coordinate! WGS84 is what GPS uses, but you can change that often to match map's 'datum'.

The presentation layer can be UTM (translation to XY in meters per map cell), or the degree thing (always latitude first, then longitude). Common in mapping was: degrees°minutes'seconds" but computers can't cope with that easily and users don't know how to enter that. Also with degrees°minutes.fractionminutes'.

I would suggest to use degrees in the hddd.ddddd format: 52.52121 degrees is (vertically) 1.11 meters per 0.00001 degree. Horizontally (Greenwich Meridian distance) it depends on the latitude, but 'here' in Amsterdam/London every 0.00001 degree is 0.68 meters.

I would say: WGS84 and hddd.ddddd is the right standard. A pity that Google start up in some other presentation. Tools->Options->set to degrees to make life easier.
__________________
Tell where you are - use GPS2SMS during your trip to leave a track log on Google Maps http://www.poi66.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 Registered Users and/or Members and 3 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPS supplier in France/Spain - Urgent JulianVoelcker 4WD Overland Tech 6 9 May 2007 19:47
GPS Volunteers needed for Ripley meeting Glynn Roberts HU Travellers Meetings - UK 1 18 Apr 2007 20:24
World Mapping Project now available in digital format Rebaseonu Navigation - Maps, Compass, GPS 4 7 Mar 2007 20:38
Large format photography on MC travelling, possible? Margus Photo Forum 17 12 Oct 2004 20:27
Emission standard certificate before shipping praatika Trip Transport 0 18 Feb 2003 13:12


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:26.

Contact Us - Horizons Unlimited Motorcycle Travellers Website - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top