Jason Smolka |
25 Jan 2003 14:03 |
Attn!: fellow fans of "improved" aftermarket shift levers---
I never thought I'd have to say this, but don't get too excited about "improved" aftermarket shift levers if you don't want to risk what happened to me recently. In a very low speed spill last week on my 2002 KLR 650 I managed to snap the splined gearshift spindle off clean at the engine case thanks to the mismatch in strength between the lever and the spindle. This was a fold-away design if you are wondering. Normally I don't sneeze at having to do semi-major engine work, but at least I want a worthy reason. I feel duped now by the aftermarket industry pushing equipment that seeks to solve minor problems without researching completely the possible downsides to their "product improvements". Maybe they have never seen this. Think of the lever as a fuse guys... don't put a 50amp fuse into a 30amp circuit. After much disgust in the field, limping home(big time) and making semi-major repairs (for something that should have taken a 5 minute field swap)I have gladly reinstalled the STOCK shift lever and tossed the hype in the can. Now I carry a STOCK spare. Compared to the alternative, I will swell with joy when it breaks knowing my spare is minutes away from getting me back on the road and knowing the hell there can be to pay for simply throwing more metal at a problem. This painful lesson will have been well worth it if I can save others the frusteration, cost and time(not to mention a trip)that can be involved when you follow the herd down the slippery slopes of hyped up, poorly researched aftermarket products. Thank you, I feel better now.
|